Which statement describes how a correction should be surfaced to readers?

Which statement describes how a correction should be surfaced to readers?

• A. Corrections should be made silently without notifying readers.
• B. Corrections should be buried in the revision history with no note.
• C. Corrections should be posted as a separate article only.
• D. Corrections should be updated in the article, a correction note should be appended, and the revision history should be accessible.

Answer: (D)

Corrections should be surfaced to readers in a transparent and traceable way. The best approach is to update the article with the correct information, append a correction note describing what was wrong and what changed, and keep the revision history accessible so readers can review the edit timeline. This approach keeps the correction in the original context, provides clarity about the changes, and supports accountability and trust in the publication. Silent edits, hiding the change in revision history without a note, or issuing a separate correction article all undermine transparency and can confuse readers about what was corrected. So the proper practice is to update the article, attach a correction note, and maintain an accessible revision history.

Corrections should be surfaced to readers in a transparent and traceable way. The best approach is to update the article with the correct information, append a correction note describing what was wrong and what changed, and keep the revision history accessible so readers can review the edit timeline. This approach keeps the correction in the original context, provides clarity about the changes, and supports accountability and trust in the publication. Silent edits, hiding the change in revision history without a note, or issuing a separate correction article all undermine transparency and can confuse readers about what was corrected. So the proper practice is to update the article, attach a correction note, and maintain an accessible revision history.